| Spy Penguins Risk Management | |||||||||||
| Risk Description | Severity | Probability | Risk Factor | Risk Owner | Note: Risk factors are based on severity*probability. Values assigned to high, medium and low are 1, .6, and .2 respectively. Green (factor <.3) risks are very low risk events. Yellow risks (.3 <= factor <= .5) are slightly risky and should have mitigation strategies in place. Red risks (factor > .5) should be closely monitored with prevention in mind. | ||||||
| Cannot complete all releases on time[1] | medium | high | 0.60 | Mark | |||||||
| Having to wait to discuss project with potential users[2] | high | medium | 0.60 | Phil | |||||||
| High number of defects pushes back a release date[3] | high | medium | 0.60 | Phil | |||||||
| System needs to be reworked due to integration failure[4] | medium | high | 0.60 | Joe | |||||||
| Schedule provides inaccurate view of project timeline[5] | medium | medium | 0.36 | Phil | |||||||
| Delays caused by waiting for sponsor feedback[6] | medium | medium | 0.36 | Rob | |||||||
| Stakeholders add requirements[7] | medium | medium | 0.36 | Tom | |||||||
| UI requirement changes to desktop application[8] | medium | medium | 0.36 | Mark | |||||||
| GWT tool is ineffective for this problem[9] | high | low | 0.20 | Joe | |||||||
| Loosely defined initial requirements lead to redesign[10] | high | low | 0.20 | Rob | |||||||
| Stakeholders change priority of increments[11] | high | low | 0.20 | Tom | |||||||
| Under-estimate the time needed for web development research[12] | high | low | 0.20 | Joe | |||||||
| JAXP does not fulfill our needs for XML parsing[13] | medium | low | 0.12 | Joe | |||||||
| Master definition needs to change late in the project[14] | medium | low | 0.12 | Rob | |||||||
| Team member embellishes status of task completion [15] | medium | low | 0.12 | Joe | |||||||