|
Spy Penguins Risk
Management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk Description |
Severity |
Probability |
Risk Factor |
Risk Owner |
|
Note: Risk
factors are based on severity*probability. Values assigned to high, medium
and low are 1, .6, and .2 respectively. Green (factor <.3) risks are very
low risk events. Yellow risks (.3 <= factor <= .5) are slightly risky
and should have mitigation strategies in place. Red risks (factor > .5)
should be closely monitored with prevention in mind. |
|
Cannot complete all releases on
time[1] |
medium |
high |
0.60 |
Mark |
|
|
Having to wait to discuss
project with potential users[2] |
high |
medium |
0.60 |
Phil |
|
|
High number of defects pushes
back a release date[3] |
high |
medium |
0.60 |
Phil |
|
|
System needs to be reworked due
to integration failure[4] |
medium |
high |
0.60 |
Joe |
|
|
Schedule provides inaccurate
view of project timeline[5] |
medium |
medium |
0.36 |
Phil |
|
|
Delays caused by
waiting for sponsor feedback[6] |
medium |
medium |
0.36 |
Rob |
|
|
Stakeholders add
requirements[7] |
medium |
medium |
0.36 |
Tom |
|
|
UI requirement
changes to desktop application[8] |
medium |
medium |
0.36 |
Mark |
|
|
GWT tool is
ineffective for this problem[9] |
high |
low |
0.20 |
Joe |
|
|
Loosely defined
initial requirements lead to redesign[10] |
high |
low |
0.20 |
Rob |
|
|
Stakeholders
change priority of increments[11] |
high |
low |
0.20 |
Tom |
|
|
|
Under-estimate
the time needed for web development research[12] |
high |
low |
0.20 |
Joe |
|
|
|
|
JAXP does not
fulfill our needs for XML parsing[13] |
medium |
low |
0.12 |
Joe |
|
|
|
Master
definition needs to change late in the project[14] |
medium |
low |
0.12 |
Rob |
|
|
|
Team member
embellishes status of task completion [15] |
medium |
low |
0.12 |
Joe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|