Interview Assignment Evaluation Rubric
This is the rubric your instructor will use to evaluate your assignment to interview a software professional.
Interview Depth |
Excellent |
Satisfactory |
Poor |
Unacceptable |
What technologies are employed? (and related) |
||||
What is typical workday like? (and related) |
||||
What are the most important skills needed to succeed in the job? (and related) |
||||
Reflection |
Excellent |
Satisfactory |
Poor |
Unacceptable |
Aspects of work (and related) |
||||
Positive and negative issues (and related) |
||||
Ethical challenges or implications (and related) |
||||
Overall career choice (and related) |
||||
Required Elements |
Excellent |
Satisfactory |
Poor |
Unacceptable |
Name, company or organization, title or position, length of service, city, previous employers/experience in first part of paper. |
All present. |
All but one present. |
Some present. |
None present. |
Transcript provided |
Full transcript included. |
Partial transcript included. |
Minimal transcript included. |
No transcript included. |
(Continues below) |
|
|
|
|
Requirements - Discussion of Interview |
Excellent |
Satisfactory |
Poor |
Unacceptable |
Discussion of interview at some level |
||||
Style |
Excellent |
Satisfactory |
Poor |
Unacceptable |
Style |
Crisp writing in the active voice, clear transitions between topics, no excess verbiage |
A few instances of poor sentence structure, run-on sentences, passive constructs, incoherent paragraphs. |
Poor sentence structure, incoherent paragraphs and excessive passive voice, run on sentences throughout. |
Writing is practically incomprehensible. |
Mechanics |
Excellent |
Satisfactory |
Poor |
Unacceptable |
MLA Format |
Full MLA format. |
Reasonable MLA formatting. |
Few MLA formatting guidelines followed. |
No MLA standards followed. |
Spelling, Grammar, and Readability |
No spelling or grammar errors, highly readable. |
Spelling and grammar errors occasionally occur but do not interfere with readability |
Few pages without errors making reading a chore. Readability a significant problem. |
Mechanics errors make it a struggle to decipher meaning. |
Overall Score |
Excellent |
Satisfactory |
Poor |
Unacceptable |