This page provides details about activities and grading of Sprint 1.

Additional Project Information

Your custom U-Fund project scenario guides your user stories.

Project Activities (5% in final grade)

Team Exercises (part of 13% for team exercises)

Submission Instructions

Grading Rubric

5% in final grade Exceptional Performance
100 points
Competent Performance
88 points
Acceptable Performance
75 points
Developing Performance
50 points

Unacceptable Performance
0 points

Adherence to Architecture
35%
Team properly adheres to architecture supplied in the Architectural Lessons of this sprint. Team mostly adheres to architecture with a few gaps. Team lacks adherence to the architecture. Team poorly adheres to the architecture. Code base is virtually empty.
Acceptance Test Plan
5%
Complete Acceptance Test Plan submitted showing the status of all tests. Complete Acceptance Test Plan submitted with a few issues with test status. Only minor issues were found with the Acceptance Test Plan and test status. Major problems with Acceptance Test Plan or the status of tests. No Acceptance Test Plan submitted, or it does not indicate the status of any tests.
Demo
25%
Team created a polished demo which covered all required features and unique inputs in detail, was easy to follow and showed the program runs without any problems. Team created a polished demo which was easy to follow but there were a few minor issues noted with the demo. Team created demo but there were major issues with delivery. Team did not appear prepared but was able to carry off something of a demo. Team did not provide demo or created one with minimal results.
Planning Activities
10%
Team correctly entered user stories into the sprint backlog and tracked them through to completion. All team members were involved in planning activities but there were a few minor issues noted. Only a portion of the team was involved in planning activities, or it was not done consistently. Only a portion of the team was involved in planning activities, and it was not done consistently. Minimal evidence of team performing planning activities.
Version Control Activities
15%
The team consistently used version control to track project artifacts. The team used version control but its use was not consistent. The team used version control, but its use was only in a bursts. The team had minimal use of version control, or its use was mostly just prior to submission. There is little evidence of the team using version control to track artifacts.
Team Communication
10%
Team consistently communicates using Slack workspace including Virtual Standups. Team has mostly regular use of Slack workspace including Virtual Standups. Team uses Slack workspace including Virtual Standups in bursts. Some evidence of use of Slack workspace including Virtual Standups. Minimal evidence of use of Slack workspace.