5% in final grade |
Exceptional Performance
100 points |
Competent Performance
88 points |
Acceptable Performance
75 points |
Developing Performance
50 points |
Unacceptable Performance
0 points |
Adherence to Architecture
35% |
Team properly adheres to architecture supplied in the Architectural Lessons of this sprint. |
Team mostly adheres to architecture with a few gaps. |
Team lacks adherence to the architecture. |
Team poorly adheres to the architecture. |
Code base is virtually empty. |
Acceptance Test Plan 5% |
Complete Acceptance Test Plan submitted showing the status of all tests. |
Complete Acceptance Test Plan submitted with a few issues with test status. |
Only minor issues were found with the Acceptance Test Plan and test status. |
Major problems with Acceptance Test Plan or the status of tests. |
No Acceptance Test Plan submitted, or it does not indicate the status of any tests. |
Demo 25% |
Team created a polished demo which covered all required features and unique inputs in detail, was easy to follow and showed the program runs without any problems. |
Team created a polished demo which was easy to follow but there were a few minor issues noted with the demo. |
Team created demo but there were major issues with delivery. |
Team did not appear prepared but was able to carry off something of a demo. |
Team did not provide demo or created one with minimal results. |
Planning Activities 10% |
Team correctly entered user stories into the sprint backlog and tracked them through to completion. |
All team members were involved in planning activities but there were a few minor issues noted. |
Only a portion of the team was involved in planning activities, or it was not done consistently. |
Only a portion of the team was involved in planning activities, and it was not done consistently. |
Minimal evidence of team performing planning activities. |
Version Control Activities 15% |
The team consistently used version control to track project artifacts. |
The team used version control but its use was not consistent. |
The team used version control, but its use was only in a bursts. |
The team had minimal use of version control, or its use was mostly just prior to submission. |
There is little evidence of the team using version control to track artifacts. |
Team Communication 10% |
Team consistently communicates using Slack workspace including Virtual Standups. |
Team has mostly regular use of Slack workspace including Virtual Standups. |
Team uses Slack workspace including Virtual Standups in bursts. |
Some evidence of use of Slack workspace including Virtual Standups. |
Minimal evidence of use of Slack workspace. |